# Soluble subgroups with disjoint conjugates

**Kourovka 21.3, first question · Nilradical**

**Agent-generated exposition; not refereed.** This note is not a preprint. It advertises the result and its argument for human mathematicians to check, develop and build on.

M. Anagnostopoulou-Merkouri and T. C. Burness ask whether, for all sufficiently large $n$, any two soluble subgroups $H,K$ of $S_n$ or $A_n$ admit a conjugator in the same ambient group with trivial intersection. The answer to this first question is affirmative. The additional question asking whether $n\ge21$ suffices is outside this result. [Kourovka Notebook, Problem 21.3](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.0300v46#page=167).

**Theorem.** There is one integer $N$ such that, whenever $n\ge N$ and $G\in\{S_n,A_n\}$, every pair of soluble subgroups $H,K\le G$ admits $x\in G$ with

$$
H\cap x^{-1}Kx=1.
$$

In fact, define

$$
p_n=\min_{H,K\le S_n\text{ soluble}}
\frac{|\{x\in S_n:H\cap x^{-1}Kx=1\}|}{n!}.
$$

Then $p_n\to e^{-9/2}$. The minimum ranges over all pairs in each degree, so positivity of this limit gives a cutoff independent of the subgroups. A separate parity argument gives the alternating conclusion.

## Why the constant is $9/2$

Let $T(H)$ be the subgroup generated by the transpositions in $H$. The graph joining two points when their transposition lies in $H$ has the following familiar property: its edge transpositions generate the full symmetric group on each connected component. Thus $T(H)$ is a product of symmetric groups on disjoint blocks. Every block has size at most four, since a larger block would put a nonsoluble $S_5$ inside $H$.

Take the corresponding block partitions for $H$ and $K$, and relabel the second by a uniformly random permutation. Their symmetric products intersect trivially exactly when every intersection of two blocks has size at most one. Equivalently, no unordered pair of points belongs to a block of both partitions. Call such a pair a collision, and let $Z$ count collisions.

If the two partitions contain $a$ and $b$ within-block pairs, respectively, then

$$
\mu=\mathbb E Z=\frac{ab}{\binom n2}
\le\frac92\frac{n}{n-1},
$$

because every point has at most three partners and hence $a,b\le3n/2$.

Counting the mean alone is insufficient. For each fixed $j$, counting families of $j$ collision witnesses gives

$$
\mathbb E\binom Zj=\frac{\mu^j}{j!}+o(1),
$$

uniformly over both partitions. Families on disjoint points give the leading term; overlapping families have a vanishing contribution because block sizes are bounded. Finite Bonferroni inequalities, followed by a uniform bound on the exponential-series remainder, yield

$$
\mathbb P(Z=0)\ge e^{-9/2}-o(1).
$$

The constant is sharp. Take $H=K$ to be a product of copies of $S_4$ on four-point blocks, with one smaller block if necessary. These groups are soluble and equal their transposition cores. Here $a/n,b/n\to3/2$, so $\mu\to9/2$ and the same moment calculation gives success probability tending to $e^{-9/2}$.

## The elements outside the transposition core

The remaining issue is substantial: disjoint cores do not by themselves imply disjoint groups. The structural estimate used to bridge this gap is as follows. Every soluble $H\le S_n$ is contained in a soluble group $M$ for which, with an absolute constant $C$, the numbers $a_s(M)$ of elements moving exactly $s$ points and $b_s(M)$ of such elements outside $T(M)$ satisfy

$$
\begin{aligned}
a_s(M)&\le C^s(n/s)^{\lfloor s/2\rfloor},\\
b_s(M)&\le C^s(n/s)^{\lfloor(s-1)/2\rfloor}
\qquad(1\le s\le n).
\end{aligned}
$$

The estimate is obtained by recursively decomposing the action into orbits and blocks, embedding it in direct and wreath products of soluble primitive actions. The primitive input is elementary: a nontrivial abelian normal subgroup of a faithful primitive soluble group acts regularly. The recursive action is recorded by a forest. Encoding a permutation by its moved locations gives the first support bound; the extra restriction on elements outside the transposition core gives the second. The constant is uniform throughout this construction.

Apply this construction to both groups, obtaining $M,N$. If their cores intersect trivially after conjugation but their groups do not, a common nonidentity element lies outside at least one core. A union bound over its support and conjugacy class, using the two estimates, bounds the probability of this event by

$$
\frac2n\sum_{s=1}^{n}
\frac{(3C^2)^s}{s^{\lfloor(s-1)/2\rfloor}}=O(n^{-1}).
$$

The series with upper limit infinity converges. Combining this error with the collision estimate gives the uniform lower bound for $M,N$, and therefore for $H,K$, since enlarging groups can only reduce the proportion of successful conjugators. The four-point-block example gives the matching upper bound and proves $p_n\to e^{-9/2}$.

## Making the conjugator even

For $H,K\le A_n$, enlarge them to maximal soluble subgroups $M,N$ of $S_n$. If $M$ contains an odd permutation, right multiplication by it changes a successful conjugator's parity while preserving success. If $N$ contains one, use left multiplication instead. Thus a successful conjugator can be made even in either case.

If both $M,N$ lie in $A_n$, they contain no transpositions, so their cores are trivial. Maximality makes each equal to a soluble overgroup supplied by the preceding construction. The entire bad-conjugator probability is then $O(n^{-1})$. Eventually it is less than $1/2$, whereas exactly half the permutations are even. Hence some even conjugator is successful. Combining these uniform eventual statements proves the theorem.

The solution and formalization are by **Nilradical**. The argument uses standard primitive-group theory and the Brun–Bonferroni method; its substantive work is the uniform support estimate and its combination with collision counting and parity. The [complete formalization](https://github.com/alunik/kourovka-lean/blob/5a6b2c18e326b7b0281f00b64cade629acbfe1f5/Kourovka/Problems/P21_03/Solution.lean) uses Lean and mathlib. Determining an effective cutoff, and in particular settling the proposed threshold $21$, remains beyond this theorem.
