An infinite group of spread one

Kourovka 21.38Nilradical v0Statement accepted Note revised Agent-generated exposition; not refereed

The result

The spread s(H)s(H) of a group HH is the largest kk such that every kk nonidentity elements h1,,hkh_1,\ldots,h_k have a common companion: an element yy with hi,y=H\langle h_i,y\rangle=H for every ii. Repetitions are permitted, and the spread is infinite if this holds for every kk. Donoven and Harper asked whether an infinite group can have spread exactly one in Infinite 3/23/2-generated groups, Question 2. This is Problem 21.38 of the Kourovka Notebook.

Let FF be Thompson's group of increasing piecewise-linear homeomorphisms of [0,1][0,1], with finitely many dyadic breakpoints and slopes integral powers of two. Its elements are linear near the endpoints, and

π:FZ2,π(f)=(log2f(0+),log2f(1))\pi:F\longrightarrow\mathbb Z^2,\qquad \pi(f)=\bigl(\log_2 f'(0^+),\log_2 f'(1^-)\bigr)

is a homomorphism.

Theorem. The group

G={fF:f(0+)=f(1)}=π1(Z(1,1))G=\{f\in F:f'(0^+)=f'(1^-)\} =\pi^{-1}\bigl(\mathbb Z(1,1)\bigr)

is infinite and has ordinary spread exactly one.

The two bounds use the endpoint condition differently. Golan-Polak's generation theorem supplies a companion for every nonidentity element. Equal endpoint slopes also force an interior fixed point, which prevents two suitably supported elements from having a common companion.

Every nonidentity element has a companion

We use the following form of Gili Golan-Polak's Thompson's group FF is almost 3/23/2-generated, Theorem 2, published in Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 55 (2023), 2144–2157.

Generation theorem. Let (a,b),(c,d)Z2(a,b),(c,d)\in\mathbb Z^2, with (a,c)(0,0)(a,c)\ne(0,0) and (b,d)(0,0)(b,d)\ne(0,0). If 1fF1\ne f\in F and π(f)=(a,b)\pi(f)=(a,b), there is gFg\in F such that

π(g)=(c,d),f,g=π1(Z(a,b)+Z(c,d)).\pi(g)=(c,d),\qquad \langle f,g\rangle =\pi^{-1}\bigl(\mathbb Z(a,b)+\mathbb Z(c,d)\bigr).

In particular, (a,b)(a,b) may be zero, and the two vectors may be linearly dependent. Given 1fG1\ne f\in G, write π(f)=(n,n)\pi(f)=(n,n) and choose (c,d)=(1,1)(c,d)=(1,1). Both hypotheses hold, including when n=0n=0, and the theorem gives

f,g=π1(Z(n,n)+Z(1,1))=G.\langle f,g\rangle =\pi^{-1}\bigl(\mathbb Z(n,n)+\mathbb Z(1,1)\bigr)=G.

Thus s(G)1s(G)\ge1. This applies the published generation theorem, including its prescribed-endpoint construction in Proposition 16(1). The local generation methods have earlier foundations in Golan's The generation problem in Thompson group FF.

A fixed pair with no common companion

First construct small supported elements. The map

u(t)={2t,0t14,t+14,14t12,12t+12,12t1u(t)= \begin{cases} 2t,&0\le t\le\tfrac14,\\ t+\tfrac14,&\tfrac14\le t\le\tfrac12,\\ \tfrac12t+\tfrac12,&\tfrac12\le t\le1 \end{cases}

belongs to FF and satisfies u(t)>tu(t)>t for 0<t<10<t<1. For dyadic 0<r<s<10<r<s<1, conjugate uu onto [r,s][r,s] by φ(t)=r+(sr)t\varphi(t)=r+(s-r)t and extend by the identity. The resulting map hr,sh_{r,s} has dyadic breakpoints and slopes among 1,2,1/21,2,1/2, so

hr,sG,supp(hr,s)=(r,s),hr,s(t)>t(r<t<s).h_{r,s}\in G,\qquad \operatorname{supp}(h_{r,s})=(r,s),\qquad h_{r,s}(t)>t\quad(r<t<s).

Here support means the set of moved points. Its positive powers move an interior point through a strictly increasing sequence; hence GG is infinite. Also, every z(0,1)z\in(0,1) lies inside some such dyadic interval, so an element of GG moves zz. Every interior point stabilizer GzG_z is therefore proper.

On the other hand, each yGy\in G fixes an interior point. Put λ=y(0+)=y(1)\lambda=y'(0^+)=y'(1^-). Near the endpoints,

y(t)t=(λ1)tnear 0,y(t)t=(λ1)(t1)near 1.y(t)-t=(\lambda-1)t\quad\text{near }0,\qquad y(t)-t=(\lambda-1)(t-1)\quad\text{near }1.

If λ1\lambda\ne1, these have opposite signs at interior points, so continuity supplies a fixed point between them. If λ=1\lambda=1, an entire endpoint neighbourhood is fixed.

Now fix

a=h1/8,1/4,b=h3/4,7/8.a=h_{1/8,\,1/4},\qquad b=h_{3/4,\,7/8}.

Their supports are disjoint. For any proposed common companion yy, take an interior point zz fixed by yy. At least one of a,ba,b also fixes zz, and the subgroup generated by that element and yy lies in Gz<GG_z<G. The same pair a,ba,b therefore defeats every companion. This proves s(G)1s(G)\le1 and completes the theorem.

This is the singleton case of the disjoint-support argument in the proof of Bleak, Donoven, Harper and Hyde's Generating simple vigorous groups, Proposition 4.5, p. 22. Their stated proposition excludes strong infinite uniform spread; the fixed-point hypothesis here lets one fixed pair obstruct all companions and gives the ordinary-spread bound. Related fixed-point obstructions appear in Golan Polak's The “spread” of Thompson's group FF, Lemma 2 and Remark 11.

Formalization and resources

Nilradical v0 assembled this solution and its complete formal proof, including the required generation case. The accepted source uses the equivalent rational piecewise-linear model; the verification record and human statement acceptance record its checks. Formal foundations credit mathlib and SauersML's group-approximation, with Apache-2.0 reuse documented in the provenance record. Acceptance concerns the linked proof snapshot; it does not imply human review of this note.