Dense generators with slow growth

Kourovka 21.44Nilradical v0Statement accepted Note revised Agent-generated exposition; not refereed

The construction

Sean Eberhard's Problem 21.44 concerns the inverse limit WW of the iterated natural permutational wreath products of A5A_5. Equivalently, WW is the group of automorphisms of the rooted five-ary tree whose local permutations are all even. The question asks for a finitely generated dense subgroup with subexponential growth.

Write X={1,2,3,4,5}X=\{1,2,3,4,5\}. For g=(g1,,g5)σgg=(g_1,\ldots,g_5)\sigma_g, the gig_i are its actions on the subtrees below the root, called sections. We use right actions:

(iv)g=iσgvgi,(gh)i=gihiσg,σgh=σgσh.(iv)^g=i^{\sigma_g}v^{g_i},\qquad (gh)_i=g_i h_{i^{\sigma_g}},\qquad \sigma_{gh}=\sigma_g\sigma_h.

Permutation products are thus read from left to right.

Theorem. Put α=(123)\alpha=(1\,2\,3) and β=(345)\beta=(3\,4\,5). The recursions

a=(1,1,1,a,1)α,b=(b,1,1,1,1)βa=(1,1,1,a,1)\alpha,\qquad b=(b,1,1,1,1)\beta

define elements of order three. The group G=a,bG=\langle a,b\rangle is dense in WW and has subexponential word growth: for S={a,a1,b,b1}S=\{a,a^{-1},b,b^{-1}\} and γ(n)={g:S(g)n}\gamma(n)=|\{g:\ell_S(g)\le n\}|,

limnlogγ(n)n=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\log\gamma(n)}n=0.

Finite recursion on word length defines compatible tree automorphisms. Since α\alpha fixes 44 and β\beta fixes 11,

a3=(1,1,1,a3,1),b3=(b3,1,1,1,1).a^3=(1,1,1,a^3,1),\qquad b^3=(b^3,1,1,1,1).

Induction gives a3=b3=1a^3=b^3=1, and the root permutations are nontrivial. Every letter of SS has one nontrivial section, equal to itself: at 44 for a±1a^{\pm1} and at 11 for b±1b^{\pm1}. All sections of elements of GG consequently lie in GG.

Density at every finite level

We use an elementary fact about perfect groups. If PP is perfect and KPdK\le P^d projects onto P×PP\times P in every pair of distinct coordinates, then K=PdK=P^d. Fix a coordinate ii and write Kj=ker(prjK)K_j=\ker(\operatorname{pr}_j|_K) for jij\ne i. Each KjK_j projects onto PP in coordinate ii. Whenever two normal subgroups N,MN,M do so, their commutator lies in NMN\cap M and projects onto [P,P]=P[P,P]=P. Iterating shows that jiKj\bigcap_{j\ne i}K_j projects onto PP, so KK contains the entire factor supported at ii. This holds for every ii.

Wreath-generation lemma. If P=u,vP=\langle u,v\rangle is perfect and u3=v3=1u^3=v^3=1, then

x=(1,1,1,u,1)α,y=(v,1,1,1,1)βx=(1,1,1,u,1)\alpha,\qquad y=(v,1,1,1,1)\beta

generate P5A5P^5\rtimes A_5.

To prove this, let L=x,yL=\langle x,y\rangle and K=LP5K=L\cap P^5. The root image is A5A_5: conjugating α\alpha by β\beta and β2\beta^2 gives (124)(1\,2\,4) and (125)(1\,2\,5), and these together with α\alpha generate A5A_5. For lLl\in L and kKk\in K,

(l1kl)iσl=li1kili.(l^{-1}kl)_{i^{\sigma_l}}=l_i^{-1}k_i l_i.

Direct multiplication gives

xy=(1,1,v,u,1)(12453),xy1=(1,1,v1,u,1)(12543).\begin{aligned} xy&=(1,1,v,u,1)(1\,2\,4\,5\,3),\\ xy^{-1}&=(1,1,v^{-1},u,1)(1\,2\,5\,4\,3). \end{aligned}

Their fifth powers lie in KK, with first coordinates uvuv and uv1uv^{-1}. The quotient (uv)1(uv1)=v2=v(uv)^{-1}(uv^{-1})=v^{-2}=v recovers vv, then uu. Root transitivity and the conjugation formula show that every coordinate projection of KK is PP.

We next obtain a full pair projection. Put Q=pr4,5(K)Q=\operatorname{pr}_{4,5}(K) and

N={pP:(p,1)Q}.N=\{p\in P:(p,1)\in Q\}.

Surjectivity makes NN normal in PP. Conjugation by xx sends (p,q)Q(p,q)\in Q to (u1pu,q)(u^{-1}pu,q), since α\alpha fixes 4,54,5. Hence u1pup1Nu^{-1}pup^{-1}\in N for every pPp\in P. Thus uNuN is central in P/NP/N. This quotient is generated by uN,vNuN,vN, so it is abelian; as a quotient of a perfect group it is trivial. It follows that Q=P×PQ=P\times P. Two-transitivity of A5A_5 transports this conclusion to every pair of coordinates, and the preceding perfect-group fact gives K=P5K=P^5. The root image is also full, proving the lemma.

Now W0=1W_0=1 and Wn+1=Wn5A5W_{n+1}=W_n^5\rtimes A_5. Each WnW_n is perfect, because both the base and complement of this wreath product lie in its derived subgroup. Applying the lemma inductively shows that the restrictions of the single pair a,ba,b generate every WnW_n. Kernels of the maps WWnW\to W_n form a neighbourhood basis of the identity, so GG is dense.

Sign changes shorten sections

Write =S\ell=\ell_S and L(g)=i=15(gi)L(g)=\sum_{i=1}^5\ell(g_i). The section formula gives

L(gh)L(g)+L(h).L(gh)\le L(g)+L(h).

Routing a word into its five sections records each letter exactly once, so the total unreduced section-word length equals the original length.

Since a3=b3=1a^3=b^3=1, two successive letters from the same generator family can be replaced by at most one. Every geodesic word therefore alternates between a±1a^{\pm1} and b±1b^{\pm1}. If its signs are ε1,,εm\varepsilon_1,\ldots,\varepsilon_m, define

V(w)={j:1jm2, εjεj+2}.V(w)=\bigl|\{j:1\le j\le m-2,\ \varepsilon_j\ne\varepsilon_{j+2}\}\bigr|.

This counts sign changes between successive occurrences of each generator family.

Shortening estimate. An alternating word ww of length mm representing gg satisfies

L(g)+V(w)10m+1.L(g)+\frac{V(w)}{10}\le m+1.

Consider

bϵabηa1bζ,aϵbaηb1aζ,ϵ,η,ζ{1,1}.b^\epsilon a b^\eta a^{-1}b^\zeta,\qquad a^\epsilon b a^\eta b^{-1}a^\zeta, \qquad \epsilon,\eta,\zeta\in\{1,-1\}.

In the first pattern, coordinate 11 follows 1,1,2,2,1,11,1,2,2,1,1 and records bϵbζb^\epsilon b^\zeta, reducible to at most one letter. The other three letters appear elsewhere, giving total section length at most four. In the second, coordinate 44 follows 4,4,5,5,4,44,4,5,5,4,4 and records aϵaζa^\epsilon a^\zeta, with the same saving.

Let DD count downward sign changes, from +1+1 to 1-1, at distance two. In each parity subsequence the two directions of change alternate, so V(w)2D+2V(w)\le2D+2. Each downward change gives one displayed five-letter pattern unless it is too close to an endpoint; at most two are lost. There are thus at least MV(w)/23M\ge V(w)/2-3 occurrences. Greedy selection from left to right gives qM/5q\ge M/5 disjoint occurrences, because each choice discards at most five starting positions. Subadditivity now gives

L(g)4q+(m5q)=mqmV(w)10+35mV(w)10+1.L(g)\le4q+(m-5q)=m-q \le m-\frac{V(w)}{10}+\frac35 \le m-\frac{V(w)}{10}+1.

Using disjoint blocks ensures that no saving is counted twice.

Counting words and forcing zero exponential rate

For 0<δ<1/20<\delta<1/2, put

h(δ)=δlogδ(1δ)log(1δ).h(\delta)=-\delta\log\delta-(1-\delta)\log(1-\delta).

An alternating word is determined by its length, first generator family, first two signs and variation positions. The number of words of length at most nn with V(w)δnV(w)\le\delta n is therefore at most

8(n+1)jδn(nj)8(n+1)enh(δ).8(n+1)\sum_{j\le\delta n}\binom nj \le8(n+1)e^{nh(\delta)}.

For the last inequality, use δj(1δ)njenh(δ)\delta^j(1-\delta)^{n-j}\ge e^{-nh(\delta)} when jδnj\le\delta n, and sum the corresponding terms of the binomial probability distribution. Words of length zero or one are covered by arbitrary unused initial bits.

Choose one geodesic for each element in the radius-nn ball. Those with few variations are counted above. Every remaining element satisfies L(g)(1δ/10)n+1L(g)\le(1-\delta/10)n+1 by shortening. Its root permutation and five sections determine it, so

γ(n)8(n+1)enh(δ)+60k1++k5(1δ/10)n+1γ(k1)γ(k5).\gamma(n)\le8(n+1)e^{nh(\delta)} +60\sum_{k_1+\cdots+k_5\le(1-\delta/10)n+1} \gamma(k_1)\cdots\gamma(k_5).

The sum is over nonnegative integers. This upper bound only needs injectivity of the root-and-sections description; arbitrary tuples need not occur.

Put λ=lim supnlogγ(n)/n\lambda=\limsup_{n\to\infty}\log\gamma(n)/n. Since 1γ(n)5n1\le\gamma(n)\le5^n, it is finite and nonnegative. For each ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is C1C\ge1 such that γ(k)Ce(λ+ε)k\gamma(k)\le Ce^{(\lambda+\varepsilon)k} for all kk. The sum has at most (n+2)5(n+2)^5 terms. Setting r=1δ/10r=1-\delta/10, taking logarithms and passing to the limsup gives

λmax{h(δ),r(λ+ε)}.\lambda\le\max\{h(\delta),r(\lambda+\varepsilon)\}.

Let ε0\varepsilon\downarrow0. If λ>0\lambda>0, choose δ\delta small enough that h(δ)<λh(\delta)<\lambda. Since r<1r<1, both entries of max{h(δ),rλ}\max\{h(\delta),r\lambda\} are strictly below λ\lambda, a contradiction. Thus λ=0\lambda=0, proving the asserted limit. Changing finite generating set only rescales ball radii by a constant.

Antecedents and contribution

Brieussel constructed dense two-generated subgroups of intermediate growth for the analogous alternating wreath limits in degrees at least 2929: see Amenability and non-uniform growth of some directed automorphism groups of a rooted tree and his thesis, §3.6. His construction uses Wilson's eligible generating pairs of orders two and three from Further groups that do not have uniformly exponential growth. The division into words with few sign changes and words whose sections shorten is Brieussel's method, notably Proposition 3.6.6 of the thesis.

Woryna had obtained dense two-generated amenable subgroups for these wreath limits, including A5A_5, but his groups have exponential growth; see On some universal construction of minimal topological generating sets…, Corollary 2.

Nilradical v0's contribution recorded here is the degree-five pair and its complete proof: perfect-group generation establishes density, and the five-letter patterns adapt sign-change shortening to two generators of order three. The conclusion is qualitative subexponential growth; no explicit asymptotic rate or intermediate-growth assertion is made.

Formalization and resources

The accepted source contains the complete Lean proof; the verification record documents Lean and Nanoda checks, with human statement acceptance recorded separately. Formal foundations credit mathlib and Konstantin Slutsky and contributors' recurrent-sections-lean for general word geometry and logarithmic growth, reused under Apache-2.0 as detailed in the provenance record. Acceptance concerns the linked proof snapshot; it does not imply human review of this note.